A murder case is attracting everyone’s attention. This case raises a number of questions. The death of Mauricio Nascimentos has become a topic of public concern. An investigation is underway into the man’s death. Croydon’s famous rough sleeper Mauricio Nascimento was found dead on July 12, 2021. At the time of his last breath, he was 44 years old. This case once caused controversy but is receiving attention again. What happened to Mauricio Nascimento? How did he die? What’s wrong with this case? Get all the answers to read it properly.
The murder of Mauricio Nascimento
According to reports, he was found dead on Rush Common in Brixton Hill and the pathologist said it was the most horrific attack he had ever witnessed. The case became a controversial case. If we talk about the condition of the dead body then he was found with some injuries. He broke his nose, neck, skull and nearly all of his ribs. Police struggled to obtain forensic evidence because the site of the shocking beating was not equipped with any type of cameras. Yes, that scene was not captured by CCTV cameras. We want to tell you an important point Mauricio’s bank card was used two days after he was murdered, giving the officers a breakthrough.
When the police verified the entire case, they revealed the suspect behind the incident. However, a belt was found at the murder site and the DNA sample matched that of a 29-year-old man, identified as Arturas Ptickinas, with a one-in-a-billion chance that it arose from any source. anyone else. So this is already clear that he is a suspect in this case. However, there is no filming evidence, so this case becomes complicated.
Furthermore, HIs DNA was detected on Mauricio’s wrists, face and neck. When the police received signs of suspicion about Aleksandrovas, they compared DNA with this person and the results matched the 29-year-old. If we talk about the CCTV footage, it shows them leaving the house in Norwood High Street and leading to Rush Common. When this incident happened at 3:16 a.m., the young man’s phone was connected to a nearby antenna. When extensive forensic evidence was presented, the jury convicted both after they contested the charges. We have shared all the news details that we got from other sources to create this article for our readers. If we have further details, we will notify you in advance at the same location. Stay tuned for more updates.